I have a love/hate relationship with containers. We have used containers for production services in the Jenkins project’s infrastructure for six or seven years, where they have been very useful. I run some desktop applications in containers. There are even a few Kubernetes clusters which show the tell-tale signs of my usage. Containers are great. Not a week goes by however when some oddity in containers, or the tools around them, throws a wrench into the gears and causes me great frustration. This week was one of those weeks: we suddenly had problems building our Docker containers in one of our Kubernetes environments.

A number of years ago I was building out a product with a small team, like most teams I’ve worked with, an irreverent sense of humor emerged. One of my colleagues quite enjoyed using the term “bro” ironically; he certainly was the type of person who wouldn’t come within earshot of any group of people who might use the term with any level of seriousness. As the product started to take shape, we found ourselves in need of fake users in our test system. I’m not sure who created this first user, but the user’s fullName was set to “Test Bro.” Shortly thereafter another user was added: “Broam Chomsky.”

TLS certificates have the largest “complexity/importance” scores imaginable. Everything about them is error prone and seemingly over-engineered from top to bottom, yet they are one of the most important pieces of security and authentication in our software architectures. From an engineering management standpoint, I am finding myself adopting the rule of: estimates for any project involving certificates should be multiplied tenfold. If the project involves the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) and the Java Key Store (JKS), multiply by another ten I suppose. For my own future convenience, in this blog post I would like to outline how to add a root certificate to a Java Key Store in Red Hat-derived environments.

Over the course of my professional career I have witnessed the transition from free and open source software being something useful engineers do, to a multi-billion dollar industry with companies jumping into the frenzy. During this time I have also gone from an open source user, to contributor, to a board member. Helping to steward a few small projects, but mainly focusing on the Jenkins project. Along the way I have interacted with businesses in each role, forming opinions of their businesses. Getting a sense of their cultural values by watching and listening as their employees interact with the project, or their executives make public statements about Jenkins or open source software in general. By night I am open source contributor, but by day I am now what enterprise sales people refer to as the “buyer.” One with opinions formed by years of interactions with these companies whose products we evaluate.

Running untrusted CI/CD workloads in Jenkins is perhaps my favorite security discussion. Throwing Docker into the mix makes things even interesting, and in some cases less secure. Today I implemented a pattern which I have discussed with colleagues but hadn’t yet had the opportunity to try: a multi-Kubernetes cluster for Jenkins. In short, running a Jenkins master in a cluster which acts as the control pane for it and many other services, while running all of its workloads in an entirely separate Kubernetes cluster. For those who know the joy of managing Kubernetes this may seem like madness, but it does offer a number of security benefits which I would like to outline.

My favorite part of the stack is the netherworld between the underlying infrastructure and the app. That fuzzy grey area where data goes from databases to object-relational mappers (ORMs), web servers to request libraries (e.g. Rack/WSGI), and so on. In many cases a technology roadmap where one considers infrastructure, but not the application, or vice-versa, is doomed from the start. At Scribd, I have been given permission to hire more people that love this layer of the stack, and I have taken to calling it “Ruby Infrastructure.” A phrase which is fairly unique, that I wanted to define in greater detail.

One of the harder parts about building new platform infrastructure at a company which has been around a while is figuring out exactly where to begin. At Scribd the company has built a good product and curated a large corpus of written content, but where next? As I alluded to in my previous post about the Platform Engineering organization, our “platform” components should help scale out, accelerate, or open up entirely new avenues of development. In this article, I want to describe one such project we have been working on and share some of the thought process behind its inception and prioritization: the Real-time Data Platform.

The team that I joined Scribd to build, Core Platform is now up and running with five incredibly talented people. I could not be more pleased with the very friendly and highly functional group of people we have been able to assemble. With that team’s projects underway, my focus has been shifting, zooming out to “Platform Engineering” as a comprehensive part of the engineering group. In this post, I want to expand on what Platform Engineering is planned to be and discuss some of the teams and their responsibilities.

Yesterday we rebuilt and re-deployed one of the Jenkins containers we use at work, and much to my chagrin the Jenkins environment no longer wanted to boot. We use Jenkins on top of Kubernetes, integrated with Hashicorp Vault, configured with the Configuration as Code plugin and the Job DSL plugin. While I am pleased with this stack of tools, it is not a “simple” set up. It had been three weeks since the last rebuild and redeploy, and the name of the game was: what of the dozen changes that have happened in one of these tools over the last three weeks was the culprit.

The tech industry is filled with all sorts of silly jargon and acronyms. Our overuse of jargon not only makes us very easy to identify in a crowded restaurant but also helps make things confusing for new-comers and veterans alike. In my current role, I find myself spending a lot of time with vendors who also seem to delight in barraging prospects with unpleasant jargon. My least favorite word among it all is performant.